Table VIII
Tread Mill Test Reading After One Year of Treatment
Age Group
No. Of
Patients
Anterior
Wall
Ischaemia
No Evidence
Of
Ischaemia
Inferior
Wall
Ischaemia
No
Ischaemia
Male Diabetics
35-40
612
398
396
214
202
41-50
823
526
500
297
276
51-65
989
605
600
384
341
Male
Non-Diabetics
1065
424
399
641
582
Female Diabetics
35-40
85
31
29
54
52
41-50
207
96
93
111
107
51-65
451
302
259
149
133
Female
Non-Diabetics
768
438
388
330
295
5000
2820
2664
2180
1988




Table IX
Serum Cholesterol Levels Returned After Three Months (160-240 Mgm%)
Age Group
No. Of
Patients
290-350
Normal
351-425
Normal
426-500
Normal
Male Diabetics
35-40
612
309
306
198
192
105
100
41-50
823
429
408
256
238
138
130
51-65
989
547
504
232
231
210
206
Male
Non-Diabetics
1065
219
200
657
599
189
182
Female Diabetics
35-40
85
25
23
40
39
20
19
41-50
207
67
65
108
106
32
29
51-65
451
112
101
298
251
41
40
Female
Non-Diabetics
768
204
162
469
431
95
90
5000
1912
1769
2258
2087
830
796




Table X
Serum Trigylcerides Returned After Three Months (50-90 Mgm%)
Age Group
No. Of
Patients
151-170
Normal
171-200
Normal
201-250
Normal
Male Diabetics
35-40
612
305
300
203
200
104
98
41-50
823
415
399
301
300
107
77
51-65
989
509
489
249
229
231
223
Male
Non-Diabetics
1065
208
158
701
680
156
143
Female Diabetics
35-40
85
20
18
44
43
21
20
41-50
207
61
60
112
110
34
30
51-65
451
108
69
304
288
39
35
Female
Non-Diabetics
768
198
140
502
485
66
58
5000
1824
1633
2416
2335
760
684




Table XI
Total Lipids After Three Months of Treatment
Age Group
No. Of
Patients
851-1000
Normal
1001-1200
Normal
1200-1350
Normal
Male Diabetics
35-40
612
291
282
180
176
141
140
41-50
823
402
370
281
268
140
138
51-65
989
517
499
241
213
231
229
Male
Non-Diabetics
1065
205
155
670
650
190
176
Female Diabetics
35-40
85
22
21
42
41
21
19
41-50
207
61
60
111
109
35
31
51-65
451
104
84
313
282
34
25
Female
Non-Diabetics
768
198
168
480
430
90
85
5000
1800
1639
2318
2170
882
943




Table XII
HDL Cholesterol (Normal 50-75 Mgm) After Three Months
Age Group
No. Of
Patients
20-25
Normal
26-30
Normal
31-35
Normal
Male Diabetics
35-40
612
401
390
176
174
35
34
41-50
823
509
478
289
279
25
19
51-65
989
610
580
260
250
119
111
Male
Non-Diabetics
1065
304
254
677
647
84
80
Female Diabetics
35-40
85
15
12
50
49
20
20
41-50
207
101
97
98
96
8
7
51-65
451
156
126
258
238
37
28
Female
Non-Diabetics
768
212
180
476
418
86
85
5000
2308
2117
2278
2151
414
384




Table XIII
Blood Sugar Levels Before & After Treatmet
Age
Group
No. Of
Patients
Fasting
110-115
Normal
Fasting
116-150
Normal
P.P
161-250
Normal
P.P
251-400
Normal
Male
Diabetics
35-40
612
398
394
214
208
405
399
207
203
41-50
823
564
554
259
247
530
518
293
283
51-65
989
598
538
391
364
611
553
378
349
Female
Diabetics
35-40
85
48
45
37
35
42
40
43
40
41-50
207
140
136
67
65
131
126
76
75
51-65
451
299
259
152
145
305
275
146
129
3167
2047
1926
1120
1064
2024
1911
1143
1079




Table XIV
Drug Therapy
Verapamil
Beta-Blockers
ISDN
Digoxin & Diurects
40-80 mgm in 2 divided doses (mild cases) 40-60 mgm in 2 divided doses in mild cases to non-diabetics 10 mgm 3 to 4 times per day 0.25 mgm of digoxin & dytide 1 tab./day
&
&
80-120 mgm in 3 divided doses (moderate cases) to diabetics 80-120 mgm in 3 divided doses in moderate cases to non-diabetics




Results
Most of the patients started responding from second week after the therapy was instituted. The improvement was noticed in the form of disappearance of angina pectoris and feeling of well being. The ECG changes also started improving and from 3 months to one year all patients, except 348, had normal tracing even after treadmill (Table VIII).

None of the patients suffered fresh myocardial infarction during the study. The lipid profile also started improving after three months of institution of therapy (Table IX).

Out of 5000 patients, 4652 patients had their normal levels of serum cholesterol ranging from 160 Mgm to 240 Mgm%, serum triglycerides from 50-90 Mgm% (Table X).

Total lipids from 500 Mgm to 800 Mgm% (Table XI), HDL cholesterol ranging from 50 Mgm to 75 Mgm% (Table XII).

Out of 3167 diabetic patients, the blood sugar values, fasting and post parendial, started coming down to normal levels (Table XIII) except in 177 patients, and all the oral hypoglycemic agents had to be withdrawn by the end of two months of therapy. On the contrary, beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, isosorbide dinitrate and diuretics, etc., which the patients were taking for hypertension and angina control, could not be withdrawn completely (Table XIV) but their doses substantially reduced to half of the quantity which they were taking. Similarly the hypertensive patients did not show any significant change in their blood pressure levels. Total number of patients who did not respond to treatment were 525 (348 ischaemic and177 diabetics out of 5000 patients).


Discussion
In the present study it has been noticed that the plant had a definite role in the prevention and management of atherosclerotic heart disease. The plant also had a definite role in controlling the blood sugar level in diabetic patients. The exact mechanism of the plant Aloe vera and Husk of Isabgol is not known but it appears that both these substances act by their high fibre contents and these substances need further evaluation. In the entire study no untoward side effect was noticed and all the patients were followed for a period of five years from July 1978 to June 1983 and all the patients turned up for regular follow up and till date all the 5000 patients are surviving. The diabetic patients, except 177 patients, are on diet control alone andnone of them has ever complained about any hypoglycemic episode during the study. There is no such study available in medical literature where such a large number (5000 patients) of patients are being followed up for five years and no Indian plant has ever been tried with such success. So this is a unique study of its own type.

To conclude, the Indian plant Aloe vera, when mixed with the Husk of Isabgol, was given to the patients of atherosclerotic heart disease, there was a definite and substantial improvement (about 95%) in their clinical profile apart from biochemical changes and ECG tracings. These two substances need further evaluation to find out the exact mechanism of action on atherosclerosis.


Acknowledgements
Appreciation to my wife, Smt. Dr. Poonam Agarwal, for her excellent co-operation incarrying out the present study.